امام ابن جُزَیّ الکلبی کے تفسیر «التسہیل لعلوم التنزیل» میں ترجیحات: دراسۃ و تقویم
رسالۂ دکتورا (درجۂ عالَمیّت) — تفسیر اور علوم القرآن، جامعۂ ازہر

جامعۂ ازہر — کلیۂ اصول الدین والدعوۃ الاسلامیۃ، طنطا (قسم تفسیر وعلوم القرآن)
طنطا — جمہوریۂ عرب مصر
۱۴۲۹ہجری / ۲۰۰۸ء
اشراف: پروفیسر شکری شفیق الاخضر، اور پروفیسر صلاح الدین یوسف شلبی
693
عربی
تحقیق کا خلاصہ
یہ رسالۂ دکتورا اندلسی مفسر امام ابن جزیّ الکلبی (م ۷۴۱ھ) کے تفسیر التسہیل لعلوم التنزیل میں ترجیح کے منہج کا تأصیلی تطبیقی مطالعہ ہے۔ محقق نے ان اصولوں کو استخراج کیا ہے جن پر ابن جزیّ نے اپنی تریجح بنائی — قرآنی نص، سنتِ نبوی، آثار، اور عربی استعمال — پھر عقیدے، فقہ، لغت، تفسیر بالمأثور، قراءات اور علوم القرآن میں ان کی ترجیحات کا تعاقب کیا۔ پوری کاوش مفسرین کی آراء کے درمیان موازنہ کرتے ہوئے ان کے منہج کا نقدی جائزہ لیتی ہے۔ یہ تین ابواب، مقدمہ، تمہید، خاتمہ اور فہارس پر مشتمل تقریباً ۶۹۳ صفحات کا رسالہ ہے، جس پر جامعۂ ازہر — کلیۂ اصول الدین بطنطا نے ۱۴۲۹ھ/۲۰۰۸ء میں درجۂ دکتورا تفویض کیا۔
Full Text
⏱ 4 min readA scholarly thesis by which the researcher was awarded the doctoral degree (al-ʿĀlamiyya) in Uṣūl al-Dīn, in the specialization of Tafsīr and the Qurʾanic Sciences — Faculty of Uṣūl al-Dīn and Islamic Daʿwah in Tanta, al-Azhar University. Supervised by Professor Shukrī Shafīq al-Akhḍar and Professor Ṣalāḥ al-Dīn Yūsuf Shalabī. 1429 AH / 2008 CE. By Dr. Ahmed Muhammad Ali Abouseif, President of the American Imams Academy.
This is an introductory page presenting the thesis and the index of its topics; the complete text is available for download as a PDF at the bottom of the page.
About the Thesis A foundational and applied study addressing the preferred opinions (murajjaḥāt) of Imām Abū al-Qāsim Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad ibn Juzayy al-Kalbī al-Gharnāṭī (d. 741 AH) in his exegesis al-Tashīl li-ʿUlūm al-Tanzīl. It draws out the principles upon which he founded his weighing of opinions (tarjīḥāt), then traces these preponderances through their loci in the tafsīr, presenting them in a critical, scholarly manner that balances the views of the exegetes against one another, and appraising the Imām's method of preponderance and the consistency with which he applied it.
The thesis rests upon three major chapters, preceded by an introduction and a preliminary survey, and followed by a conclusion and indices. The first chapter establishes the foundations of Ibn Juzayy's principles of preponderance — those bearing upon the Qurʾanic text, the Prophetic Sunnah, the transmitted reports (āthār), and the usage of the Arabs in their vocabulary and their constructions — and then appraises them. The second chapter traces his preferred opinions in matters of creed, jurisprudence, and language. The third chapter presents his preferred opinions in tafsīr bi'l-maʾthūr (exegesis by transmitted reports) and the Qurʾanic sciences: in the interpretation of the Qurʾan by the Qurʾan, by Ḥadīth, and by transmitted report; in interpretation by considered opinion (al-raʾy); in the Qurʾanic readings (qirāʾāt); and then in questions of the Qurʾanic sciences — the first of what was revealed, abrogation (naskh), the occasions of revelation, the general and the particular, and pausing and resumption — concluding with a comprehensive appraisal of his principles of preponderance.
The aim of all this is to bring into relief a robust Andalusian method of preponderance in the hands of one of the eminent masters of exegesis, to lay bare its foundations and its sources, and to offer an applied model of the "jurisprudence of preponderance" (fiqh al-tarjīḥ) among the views of the exegetes.